Gun Control: Emotions Influenced Responses Not Needed!

Recently, during the first eight months, of 2009; mass assassinations are becoming, apparently, more common, within the USA.

Included, among these assassination incidents, are mass murders, of law enforcement personnel.

The slayings, of law enforcement employees, in Oakland California and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, are receiving, much media coverage.
Unfortunately, these law enforcement incidents are bringing, with them, demands, from some individuals and groups, for more personnel, who are being employed, in law enforcement.

The Baby Boomer News does hold, the opinion; extraordinary response to the recent assassinations, in the form of additional law enforcement employees being employed is not being needed, at this time.

Please, do remember:


1. Law enforcement employees are aware; their deaths are imminent, at all times. LE members are participating, in their chosen profession.


2. LE members, who are being killed, each year, in the USA are possessing, a small census. The LE members, who are being killed, during 2008 is: 134.
More than 800,000 sworn officers are employed - 2006. The employment census continues, such to increase! Hey, the USA does not need more LE employees! Sudden, violent death, while on the job, is NOT a problem, among the LE ranks

3.We are remembering; many are employed, in LE, because the individuals are failing, such to obtain, sufficiently remunerative employment elsewhere.

4. Often, LE employees are more interested:
A. Maintaining, their four to five thousand a month salaries.
B. Riding in the Crown Vics
C. Strut about in the uniforms. LE employees are common people


These above specified priorities are taking precedent, before the LE employees are determining, what is right and what is wrong, as they are investigating, situations.
Indeed, LE employees, often, are moving, against the weakest participant, in a situation.
The LE employees moving, against, an individual so identified, is providing, the most hours of work.
Hours of work are, hopefully, justifying, a bloated existence.
Far too many states are being saddled, with multiple LE departments, each of which, is representing, only, a few thousand individuals.
Immediate to one, of these ridiculous departments, is another ridiculous department.

5.Mental health professionals, who are speaking, honestly and openly, are revealing: the personality profiles, which are being attached, for LE employees are as are the personality profiles, which are being attached for criminals. The, two groups' profiles are as two peas in a pod!

6. The Supreme Court, via the application, of combined wisdom, does determine: LE members are permitted, such to lie, while LE members ares speaking, with suspects. LE does lie. LE does it all: Big Boldface, Little White, Innuendo and Omission.

7. Regarding, the donation of monies, into memorial funds, which are, ostensibly, benefitting, the survivors, of LE employees, who are dead in the line of duty: do not contribute.

Many USA citizens are experiencing, the loss of a parent. These losses are arriving, as the citizens are young children. Children, so affected, are not benefitting, from memorial funds. LE employees' surviving children are not being entitled, for something, which is not being available for other, USA children.


The, recent carnage is being responsible; as the questions, which are being attached, for the Second Amendment, are being spoken, once again.

The Baby Boomer News does hold, the opinions:


A. The Second Amendment is too brief. The amendment, is, correctly, saying, more, as to the powers, which are remaining, with the states. Specifically, as the, day to day, firearms possessions, by individual citizens, are demonstrating, need for regulations; do the states retain the empowerments, which are necessary, as the new rules are being implemented? If so, are said regulations being enforce during time periods, wherein the USA is not enduring, attack, within the homeland. Do the states' regulations endure suspension, during times of enemy attack? Or, do the States not retain, any powers, such to regulate, via legislation, the, day to day, firearms possessions, by individual citizens?


B. The Second Amendment does state, in TBBN's opinion: the citizenry, in total, are not, at any time and for any reason, being arbitrarily and completely denied the right to possess firearms. Said firearms are being categorized, via the amendment, as being necessary for defense, of self and country, during attacks, from USA enemies.


C. The Second Amendment is reflecting, the, nation’s founders’ thoughts contexts, which are existing, as the amendment is being created. These thoughts contexts are being developed, via assessment, of the USA environment, which does exist, at the time.
Further, the Second Amendment is not incorporating, language, which is anticipating, the, possibility, these thoughts contexts are evolving and changing, with the passage of time.

The question, which we are facing, at this time, 2009: should changing thoughts contexts, if same are in existence, be applied, toward the Second Amendment

---